|
|
|
1. Introduction:
Epidemiological studies indicate that impaired renal function is a major risk factor in predisposing patients to drug toxicity.
Careful dosage adjustments can prevent much of this toxicity.
2. Assessment of Renal Function:
The most widely used test of renal function is the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which is commonly approximated as the creatinine clearance (Cl
).
Creatinine:
Good approximation of GFR:
- Eliminated only by the kidney
- Freely filtered Good approximation
- Neither secreted nor reabsorbed of GFR
- Easily and accurately measured
Measurement of Cl
(Normal ~ 120ml/min):
Requires timed urine collection and blood sample at midpoint of collection.
Urine concentration X volume Cl =
__________________________________
Plasma concentration X collection time Since measurements of Cl
require a timed urine collection, the estimation of renal function from the serum creatinine level alone is more convenient and widely used.
Limitations of serum creatinine measurement (Normal : 0.06 - 0.13 mmol/L):
(a) The relationship between the serum creatinine level and ClCr (GFR) also depends on the endogenous production of creatinine by muscle metabolism, which in turn depends largely on muscle bulk. Eg. the elderly have less skeletal muscle than do younger persons, as so an elderly person with the same serum creatinine level as a young person can still have a low Clcr (GFR). Ie. an elderly person can have renal impairment, despite a normal serum creatinine level.
To correct for age, sex, and weight-related differences in endogenous creatinine production, either measure Clcr directly or use a nomogram or the following equation to convert serum creatinine levels to Clcr values:-
(140 - age) X weight (kg) X 0.85 for women Cl (ml/sec)=
__________________________________
48,869 X serum creatinine (mmol/L)
(b) Changes in serum creatinine occur slowly following changes in renal function, ie. serum creatinine levels provide an inaccurate reflection if renal function (GFR) is changing rapidly, eg. acute renal failure.
3. Pharmacokinetic Alterations in Renal Disease:
(a) Distribution:
(i) Highly protein bound drugs:
Eg. Phenytoin, Sodium valproate, Diazepam.
fu due to:
serum albumin.
- retention of endogenous displacing peptides
Vd may
(ii) Other drugs:
Eg. Digoxin
Vd
due to reduced tissue uptake.
Clinical implications:
Loading dose = Vd X Cp
Overall, it appears most practical to administer the usual loading dose to patients with renal failure. However, it has been suggested that the loading dose of Digoxin should be reduced by about one third in these patients.
(b) Renal excretion:
In
spite of the complexity of the renal drug elimination mechanisms, it has
been found that in renal disease the renal clearance of the drug
correlates well with Cl
, and hence an estimate of the individual patient’s
renal drug eliminating capacity can be made readily.
Whether a patient requires a reduction in drug dosage due to renal disease depends on several factors:-
(i) The therapeutic index of the drug.
(ii) The proportion of renal clearance to total clearance of the drug.
Drugs for which the kidney eliminates 75% of more of the administered dose as unchanged drug in urine.
Aminoglycoside agents
Amkiacin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin, Streptomycin, Tobramycin, Netilmicin
Beta-lactam antibiotic agents
Benzylpenicillin, Phenoxymethylpenicillin, Amoxycillin, Ampicillin, Flucloxacillin, Methicillin, Ticarcillin, Carbenicillin, Cephalexin, Cefazolin, Cefoxitin, Cephamandole, Latamoxef
Other anti-infective agents
Colisin, Vancomycin, Sulphamethizole, Flucytosine, Ethambutol, Acyclovir, Amantadine
Others
Digoxin (75%), Metformin, Pyridostigmine, Atenolol, Bethanidine, Baclofen, Methotrexate, Lithium, Aminocaproic acid, Tranexamic acid, Gallamine, Alcuronium
Drugs for which the kidney eliminates 25 - 75% of the administered dose as unchanged drug in urine.
Beta-lactam antibiotic agents
Cephalothin (60%), Cefotaxime (30%), Cefaclor (50%), Mezlocillin (70%)
Other anti-infective agents
Lincomycin (25%), Sulphamethoxazole (30%), Sulfisoxazole (50%), Sulphadiazine (50%), Trimethoprim (50%), Chloroquine (50%)
Cardiovascular drugs
Procainamide (60%), Disopyramide (50%), Methyldopa (60%), Pindolol (40%), Clonidine (60%), Captopril (50%)
H2-antagonist drugs
Cimetidine (70%), Ranitidine (70%)
Others
Chlorpropamide (20-80%)*, Phenobarbital (25-5-%)*, Gold sodium thiomalate (60%), Bleomycin (50%), Hydroxyurea (50%), Neostigmine (50%), Bethanechol (60%), Atropine (40%), Hyoscine hydrobromide (70%) D-tubocurarine (40%), Pancuronium (45%), Metocurine (50%)
*Urinary pH dependent
(iii) The severity of renal impairment.
Calculation of dosage adjustment:
Clearance approach:
C F x D = _________
Cl x .. Cl
= Clm + Cl .. = Clm + fe.Cl ![]()
.. = fm.Cl + fe.Cl
![]()
.. (1 - fe).Cl + fe.Cl
![]()
NB Cl
ClCR as fe approaches 1.0
fe = fraction of systemical available dose that is excreted unchanged. Cl ![]()
= total clearance in normal patient. Assumption: Non-renal clearance (Clm) is largely unaffected by renal disease.
Example:
It is necessary to commence oral Digoxin therapy in a patient with renal disease (Clcr = 25ml/min). What is an estimated maintenance dosage?
Given
F
0.70
fe0.80
Cl![]()
130ml/min
Cl ![]()
(0.2 x 130) + (0.8 x 25) ml/min .. = 46 mL/min .. = 2.76 L/hr Aim for level of 1.5 ng/ml (
g/L and use t = 24hrs)
C = F x D
_________
Cl x .. D = C x Cl x
____________
F .. = (1.5 x 2.76 x 24) / 0.7 g daily
.. ![]()
150 g daily
Alternative approach:
Fraction of normal MD = fm + fe x (Cl /120)
.. = (1 - fe) + fe x (Cl /120)
Eg. Using above data
Fraction of normal MD = 0.2 + 0.8 x (25/120 .. = 0.37 .. Normal MD
![]()
250 g daily
.. predicted MD
= 250 x 0.37 g daily
.. = 92 g daily
Determination of doses of drugs eliminated primarily by the kidneys in renal disease:
Our
patient has Cl
of 25 ml/min
Example 1 : Gentamicin:
Aim for C
of mg/ml.
Gentamicin
clearance is > 95% by renal
route (
Cl = Cl
)
| C |
= |
dosage rate |
| ___________ |
||
| Cl |
| = | C |
|
| .. | ||
| = | 2 x 25 x (24 x 60/100) | |
| .. | ||
| = | 72mg/day |
Example 2:
Aim for C
of 1.5 ng/ml.
Digoxin
clearance is approx 75% by renal route (
Cl =
Cl
/0.75)
| C |
= |
dosage rate |
| ___________ |
||
| Cl |
| = | C |
|
| .. | ||
| = | 1.5 x 25/0.75 x (24 x 60/100) | |
| .. | ||
| = | 72 |
Estimating drug dose in renal impairment:
1. Estimate/measure CrCl.
2. Know % excreted unchanged and % metabolised.
3. Estimate altered clearance:-
Cl
= Cl
+ Cl
Eg. Acyclovir:
60% excreted unchanged and 40% metabolised
normal intravenous dosage for 70kg adult: 350mg every 8 hours.Consider a patient with a creatinine clearance of 32 ml/min:
Cl = Cl + Cl
.. Cl = 0.60 Cl + 0.40 Cl
(Where Cl
is total normal clearance)
.. new ClT = 0.60 x (32/120)Cl + 0.40Cl
.. = 0.16Cl + 0.40Cl
.. = 0.56Cl 4. Then, estimate dosage needs:-
= fraction of normal clearance X “normal” dosage
= 0.56 X “normal” dosage
= 350mg every 8/0.56 hours
250mg every 14 hours or 300mg every 12 hours
Basically, the dosage modification process involves:-
(a) Lengthening the dosage interval and/or
(b) reducing the dose size.
4. Renal Disease and Protein Binding Changes:
Every acidic drug studied that binds to albumin shows decreased binding in serum from uranemic patients.
Reasons:-
(a) Hypoalbuminaemia.
(b) Competitive displacers : endogenous peptides retained in renal disease.
Binding of acidic drugs to plasma proteins from patients with poor renal function
Drug
Binding
Reference(s)
Axlocillin
St. decreased
Fiegel and Becker (1978)
Bilirubin
Decreased
Oie et al. (1980)
Cefazolin
Decreased
Craig et al. (1973)
Cefoxitin
Decreased
Garcia et al. (1979)
Clofibrate
Decreased
Bridgman et al. (1972); Pierides et al. (1975); Gugler et al. (1979)
Congo red
Decreased
Ehrstrom (1973)
Diazoxide
Decreased
O’Malley et al. (1975); Pearson and Breckenridge (1976)
Dicloxacillin
Decreased
Craig and Wagnild (1974)
Diflunisal
Decreased
Verbeeck and De Schepper (1980)
Fluorescein
Decreased
Reidenberg and Affrime (1973)
Furosemide (frusemide)
Decreased
Andreasen and Jakobsen (1974); Rane et al. (1978)
Indomethacin
Normal
Sjoholm et al. (1976)
Methyl orange
Decreased
Dromgoole (1973)
Methyl red
Decreased
Breyer and Radcliff (1954); Campion (1973)
Naproxen
Decreased
Attila et al. (1980)
Penicillin G (benzylpenicillin)
Decreased
Craig et al. (1976); Farrell et al. (1972)
Pentobarbital
Decreased
Ehrnebo and Odar-Cederlof (1975); Reidenberg et al. (1976)
Phenobarbital
Decreased
Farrell et al. (1972)
Phenol red
Decreased
Baker (1951)
Phenylbutazone
Decreased
Andreasen (1973); Belpaire et al. (1977)
Phenytoin
Decreased
Odar-Cederlof et al. (1970); Reidenberg et al. (1971); Shoeman and Azarnoff (1972); Blum and Riegeiman (1972); Andreasen (1973); Hooper et al. (1974); Olsen et al. (1975); Ehrnebo and Odar-Cederlof (1975); Craig et al. (1976)
Salicylate
Decreased
Farrell et al. (1972); Borga et al. (1976); Andreasen (1973); Craig et al. (1976); Lowenthal et al. (1974)
Sulfadiazine
Decreased
Seppan et al. (1980)
Sulfamethoxazole
Decreased
Craig et al. (1976)
Sulfonamides
Decreased
Scholtan (1961); Buttner et al. (1969); Anton and Corey (1971); Andreasen (1973); Craig and Wagnild (1974)
Theophylline
St decreased
Reidenberg and Restivo (1979)
Thiopental
Decreased
Andreasen (1973); Ghoneim and Pandya (1975)
Thyroxine
Decreased
Arango et al. (1968)
Tryptophan
Decreased
Torrente et al. (1974)
Valporic acid
Decreased
Gugler and Mueller (1978); Brewster and Muir (1980)
Warfarin
Decreased
Belpaire et al. (1977); Sjoholm et al. (1976); Bachmann et al. (1976)
Clinical implications:
Decreased protein binding (ie. fu
) - total clearance (
fu . Cl
) of low hepatic extraction drugs is increased.
total plasma levels
![]()
free (active) levels
no need to alter dosage.
NB Beware when monitoring total plasma levels - therapeutic responses will be achieved at lower than normal therapeutic plasma levels.
It is obviously preferable to measure free drug levels in these patients.
5. Active Metabolites in Renal Disease:
Since most drug metabolites are eliminated by the kidney, if a metabolite is active, it will accumulate in renal disease and a dosage change may be necessary.
|
TABLE: Drugs which have metabolites that are clinically significant in renal failure |
|||
|
Drug |
Metabolite |
Action of Metabolite |
Management |
|
Pethidine |
Norpethidine |
CNS stimulation, seizures |
Avoid prolonged treatment or use alternative drug |
|
Propoxyphene Allopurinol |
Norpropoxyphene Oxypurinol |
CNS depression, seizures Hypouricaemia |
Avoid Reduce dose in proportion to renal function |
|
Nitroprusside Procainamide |
Thiocyanate N-acetyl procainamide |
Metabolic acidosis, encephalopathy Same as parent |
Shorten duration of treatment Reduce dose in proportion to renal function |
|
Quinidine |
3-hydroxyquinidine |
Same as parent |
Reduce dose 25% - 50% in severe renal failure |
|
Cofibrate |
Clofibric acid |
Muscle damage |
Avoid |
|
CNS = Central Nervous System |
|||
6. Altered Drug Responses (Pharmacodynamics) in Renal Disease:
Examples:
(a) Urinary tract antibacterial agents:
- Nalidixic acid
- Nitrofurantoin
do not achieve high enough urine levels in renal disease to be useful
(b) Diuretics:
Only loop diuretics are potent enough to achieve duiresis in patients with renal disease.
(c) Angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitors:
Captopril/enalapril - in renal disease, risk of
- reduced renal function
- neutropaenia
- rash
(d) NSAID’s:
Antiprostaglandin effect may produce
|
Drugs which should not be used in renal failure or used with caution |
|
|
Drug |
Reason |
|
Potassium supplements |
Hyperkalaemia |
|
Potassium-sparing diuretic agents |
Hyperkalaemia |
|
Anticoagulant agents |
Bleeding tendency |
|
Aminoglycoside drugs |
Nephrotoxicity |
|
NSAID’s |
May affect renal function |
|
Tetracycline drugs |
May cause hyperkalaemia, hyperphosphataemia and acidosis |
|
Uricosuric agents |
Ineffective |
|
Methenamine Mandelate Nalidixic acid Nitrofurantoin |
Ineffective |
7. Conclusions/Clinical Recommendations:
(a) Whenever possible, use drugs, the pharmacokinetics of which are not influenced by renal disease, and which have a large therapeutic index.
(b) With other drugs, reduced elimination of the drug and/or active metabolite may require a reduction in dose, which can be calculated from the estimated creatinine clearance.
(c) Use TDM if possible. NB preferably free levels of highly bound acidic drugs.
(d) Maintain careful clinical observation of the patient.
8. Clinical Example:
A 55 year old male (70kg) is admitted to hospital with extensive burns. The patient has a past history of chronic glomerulonephritis (serum creatinine 0.22mmol/L).
After several days in hospital, microbiological testing reveals that MRSA is present in the patient’s wounds. Because the wounds are extensive, it is decided to commence intravenous Vancomycin therapy.
You are asked to estimate a dose regimen to produce average steady-state levels of 15mg/ml.
(Data: fe = 1.0; average IV dosage: 500mg qid.
RENAL IMPAIRMENT
AND PHARMACOKINETICS QUESTIONS
1. What three factors must be considered when deciding whether to alter the dosage regimen of a drug in a patient with renal impairment? Cite at least five examples of drugs (from different groups) whose dosage regimens should be altered even in mild renal impairment.
2. Captopril is 60% excreted unchanged in urine and has a normal half-life of 1.9 hours. Estimate its half-life in a 74 year old male patient (73kg) in whom the serum creatinine level has risen to 0.18mmol/L.
3. Famotidine is 70% excreted unchanged in urine and has a normal elimination half-life of 3 hours. Estimate its half-life and an appropriate dosage in a 58 year old female patient (71kg) in whom the serum creatinine level has risen to 0.29mmol/L.
(F = 40-45%; Vd = 1.2L/kg and is unchanged in renal impairment; dosage in patients with normal renal function is 40mg daily).
4. Estimate the revised Minocycline dose to be given to a patient whose dose during normal renal f unction was 300mg per day, when 10% of the dose was excreted unchanged in urine. The revised dose was required when renal function fell by 80%:-
(a) 150mg
(b) 294mg
(c) 270mg
(d) 276mg
(e) 264mg
5. A patient on Digoxin has both renal and hepatic impairment. In place of the normal creatinine clearance of 125ml/min, his creatinine clearance was 50ml/min. His ability to metabolise Digoxin was 50% of normal. Digoxin is excreted 63% unchanged. By what proportion was his Digoxin half-life different from that of “normals”?
(a) 0.437 higher
(b) 0.563 higher
(c) 0.586 higher
(d) 0.404 lower
(e) 0.586 lower
6. Cimetidine is 75% excreted unchanged in urine and has a normal elimination half-life of 2 hours. Estimate its half-life in a 60 year old male patient (73kg) in whom the serum creatinine level has risen to 0.19mmol/L.
![]() ![]() ![]() |